Small Cyclotomic Integers

Julia Robinson is a famous mathematician responsible for fundamental work in logic and in particular on Hilbert’s Tenth problem. Less well known nowadays is that her husband, Raphael Robinson, was a number theorist at Berkeley. One question R.Robinson asked concerned small cyclotomic integers. Namely, let \alpha be a cyclotomic integer, and suppose that every conjugate of \alpha has absolute value at most R. Then what can one say about \alpha? If R \le 1, then Kronecker’s theorem says that \alpha is a root of unity (this statement only requires that \alpha is an algebraic integer). Robinson studied the problem of what happens when R \le 2 and also R \le \sqrt{5}. He made five conjectures concerning these questions, four of which were solved in the 60’s by Jones, Cassels, and Schinzel. Five decades later, Frederick Robinson (no relation!) and Michael Wurtz proved the last of these conjectures (while working with me as summer students), and their paper has just been accepted by Acta Arithmetica. In particular, they answer the following problem: if \alpha is an algebraic integer the largest of whose absolute values is R \le \sqrt{5}, then what are the possible values of R? Two such families of such numbers are those of the form

\zeta + \zeta^{-1}, \qquad i + \zeta + \zeta^{-1}

for a root of unity \zeta. These give all R of the form

2 \cos(\pi/N), \qquad  \sqrt{1 + 4 \cos^2(\pi/N)}.

Note that these sets have limit points at \sqrt{4} and \sqrt{5} respectively. It turns out that there exactly two further exceptions, as follows:

\displaystyle{\frac{\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{7}}{2}, \qquad \sqrt{\frac{5 + \sqrt{13}}{2}}}

The first element is totally real and cyclotomic, and so manifestly occurs as such an R. The second turns out to be the absolute value of 1 + \zeta_{13} + \zeta^4_{13}. The proof by Robinson and Wurtz actually applies to slightly larger values of R, and after the limit point \sqrt{5} there is another gap, and the next smallest possible R is

|1 + \zeta_{70} + \zeta^{10}_{70} + \zeta^{29}_{70}| \sim \sqrt{5.017655 \ldots}

The first two exceptional numbers turn up in relation to subfactors. How about the last example?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Mathematics and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Small Cyclotomic Integers

  1. Sadly not. We can now prove that between index 5 and index 3+\sqrt{5}=5.23… there are no subfactors besides Temperley-Lieb (at evey index) and two quantum group subfactors at about 5.04892.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s