Equidistribution of Heegner Points

I saw a nice talk by Matt Young recently (joint work with Sheng-Chi Liu and Riad Masri) on the following problem.

For a fundamental discriminant |D| of an imaginary quadratic field F, one has h_D points in X_0(1)(\mathbf{C}) with complex multiplication by the ring of integers of F. Choose a prime q which splits in F = \mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{-|D|}). One obtains a set of 2 h_D points in X_0(q)(\mathbf{C}), given explicitly as follows:

\mathbf{C}/\mathfrak{a} \mapsto \mathbf{C}/\mathfrak{a} \mathfrak{q}^{-1}

for \mathfrak{a} in the class group and \mathfrak{q} one of the two primes above q in F. The complex points X_0(q)(\mathbf{C}) can be thought of as being tiled by q+1 copies of the fundamental domain \Omega in the upper half plane.

Problem: How large does D have to be to guarantee that every one of the q+1 copies of \Omega contains one of the 2 h_K CM points by \mathcal{O}_F?

This is the question that Young and his collaborators answer. Namely, one gets an upper bound of the shape |D| < O(q^{m + \epsilon}) (with some explicit m, possibly 20), the point being that this is a polynomial bound. Note that this proof is not effective, since it trivially gives a lower bound on the order of the class group which is a power bound in the discriminant, and no such effective bounds are known.

I idly wondered during the talk about the following "mod-p" version of this problem. To be concrete, suppose that p = 2 (the general case will be similar). We now suppose that D is chosen so that 2 is inert in F. Then all the h_K points in X_0(1)(\overline{\mathbf{F}}_2) are supersingular, which means that they all reduce to the same curve E_0 with j-invariant 1728. Now, as above, choose a prime q which splits in F. The pre-image of j=1728 in X_0(q)(\overline{\mathbf{F}}_2) consists of exactly q+1 points.

Problem: How large does |D| have to be to ensure that these points all come from the reduction of one of the 2 h_K CM points by \mathcal{O}_F as above?

Since E_0 is supersingular, we know that \mathrm{Hom}(E_0,E_0) is an order in the quaternion algebra ramified at 2 and \infty. In fact, it is equal to the integral Hamilton quaternions \mathbf{H}. If E and E' are lifts of E_0, then there is naturally a degree preserving injection:

\mathrm{Hom}(E,E') \rightarrow \mathrm{Hom}(E_0,E_0) = \mathbf{H}.

The degree on the LHS is the degree of an isogeny, and it is the canonical norm on the RHS.
In particular, if E = \mathbf{C}/\mathfrak{a} and E' = \mathbf{C}/\mathfrak{a} \mathfrak{q}^{-1}, then one obtains a natural map:

\psi_{\mathfrak{a}}: \mathfrak{q}^{-1} \simeq \mathrm{Hom}(E,E')  \rightarrow \mathbf{H}

preserving norms. The norm map on \mathfrak{q}^{-1} is N(x)/N(\mathfrak{q}^{-1}). The image of the natural q isogeny is simply \psi_{\mathfrak{a}}(1), whose image has norm q. Hence the problem becomes:

Problem: If one considers all the 2 h_K-maps:

\psi_{\mathfrak{a}}: \mathfrak{q}^{-1} \rightarrow \mathbf{H}, \qquad \psi_{\mathfrak{a}}: \overline{\mathfrak{q}}^{-1} \rightarrow \mathbf{H},

do the images of 1 cover the q+1 elements of \mathbf{H} of norm q?

Given a field F in which 2 is inert, it wasn’t obvious how to explicitly write down the maps \psi_{\mathfrak{a}}, but this problem does start to look similar in flavour to the original one. Moreover, to make things even more similar, in the original formulation over \mathbf{R} one can replace modular curves by definite quaternion algebras ramified at (say) 2 and q, and then the Archimidean problem now also becomes a question of a class group surjecting onto a finite set of supersingular points. In fact, this Archimedean analogue may well be *equivalent* to the \mod 2 version I just described! Young told me that his collaborators had mentioned working with various quotients coming from quaternion algebras as considered by Gross, which I took to mean the finite quotients coming from definite quaternion algebras as above. Hence, with any luck, they will provide an answer this problem.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Mathematics and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s